<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tego Interactive &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tegointeractive.com/tag/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tegointeractive.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 10:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Apple need iPhone in the Enterprise?</title>
		<link>http://tegointeractive.com/2010-04/417/does-apple-need-iphone-in-the-enterprise/</link>
		<comments>http://tegointeractive.com/2010-04/417/does-apple-need-iphone-in-the-enterprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfred DeRose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnival of the Mobilists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tegointeractive.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been involved in a conversation over at <a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/" target="_blank">Tech Republic</a> regarding Jason Hiner's post <a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=4158" target="_blank">"Five reasons why BlackBerry is still winning in the enterprise"</a>. In short, I don't think Apple cares much about the enterprise - at least as far as the iPhone goes. Apple doesn't lose (much) by not owning the enterprise market and therefore doesn't care (much). Here is why..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/30359603@N03/3863970142" title="Mobile Qwerty Challenge"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3545/3863970142_7af22e4c38_m.jpg" /></a>I&#8217;ve recently been part of a conversation over at <a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/" target="_blank">Tech Republic</a> regarding Jason Hiner&#8217;s post <a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=4158" target="_blank">&#8220;Five reasons why BlackBerry is still winning in the enterprise&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>In short, I don&#8217;t think Apple cares much about the enterprise sector- at least as far as the iPhone goes. My guess is that Apple doesn&#8217;t lose (much) by not owning the enterprise market and therefore doesn&#8217;t care (much). Here&#8217;s why..</p>
<p>Integrated devices (ID) are what mobile operators call those devices that incorporate functionality other than voice and text messaging &#8211; what most of us refer to as smartphones. In a recent <a href="http://bit.ly/9PBcpA" target="_blank">Q1 2010 earnings call</a>, Rick Lindner, <a href="http://www.att.com/" target="_blank">AT&#038;T</a> CFO called ID users &#8220;high quality customers&#8221;. Why? Overall, ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) was up nearly 4% in the quarter for AT&#038;T, driven mostly by an increase in data plan usage. That is significant. More important however is ID users generate an average ARPU of $90 &#8211; an amazing 1.7 times that of standard customers. Understand that only 50% of AT&#038;T&#8217;s post-paid customers currently have data plans and you begin to see why operators want iPhones and other smartphones on their networks. This particular group of users can impact mobile operator bottom lines in a significant way, especially when coupled with a two year service commitment.</p>
<p>Since ID users in general are so attractive for operators, the question of iPhone or Blackberry from an operator point of view is neutral at best. In fact I would say from a raw profit perspective, the iPhone is a strong favorite because there is no longer any revenue sharing agreement with Apple. Operators would suffer by not offering Blackberry since the enterprise segment is very important.</p>
<p>Apple doesn&#8217;t comment publicly on this, though it is suspected that contrary to the Mac side of the business, they make more money on iPhone app sales than on hardware sales. In other words, profit margin on iPhone hardware is less than profit generated through purchases from iTunes and the App Store over the life of the iPhone. Now couple that with the introduction of iAd and the profit generated through in-app ad sales. Apple would make little if anything on Apps or ads in the enterprise space since most companies restrict their employee&#8217;s ability to make unauthorized purchases on their phones. So, no premium SMS voting for your favorite American Idol (or for our international audience, Superstar). No apps. And no App and ad revenue.</p>
<p>Now if Apple were to roll out strong enterprise support coupled with premium services (a la <a href="http://www.rim.com/" target="_blank">RIM</a>) that companies could justify paying for, this might change. For now, I just don&#8217;t see Apple&#8217;s motivation to push the iPhone into the enterprise sector.</p>
<p>Image credit:
<div xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30359603@N03/3863970142"><a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/a_ninjamonkey/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/a_ninjamonkey/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0</a></div>
<p></ br></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tegointeractive.com/2010-04/417/does-apple-need-iphone-in-the-enterprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Releases iPhone 3.1 and SDK Beta to Developers</title>
		<link>http://tegointeractive.com/2009-07/157/apple-releases-iphone-3-1-and-sdk-beta-to-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://tegointeractive.com/2009-07/157/apple-releases-iphone-3-1-and-sdk-beta-to-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfred DeRose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone SDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone SDK 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tegointeractive.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.apple.com/" target="_blank">Apple</a> Releases iPhone 3.1 and SDK Beta to Developers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/" target="_blank">Apple</a> has released iPhone SDK 3.1 beta and iPhone OS 3.1 beta to authorized developers. As they are beta releases, these versions are for development and testing only and use is governed by the Conﬁdentiality agreement Apple requires when authorizing it&#8217;s iPhone developers. Although the unauthorized disclosure of information relating to pre–release software &#8211; including the posting of screen shots &#8211; may subject developers to both civil and criminal liability and result in immediate termination of developers from the iPhone Developer Program, news of bug fixes and any new functionality will likely hit the Web soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tegointeractive.com/2009-07/157/apple-releases-iphone-3-1-and-sdk-beta-to-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

